Comments on: The Philosophy Within the MJ-12 Documents

By: Jacques Vallee Crosses UFO Research with Psychic Research « Reality Uncovered

Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:01:30 +0000

[...] MJ12 – Philosophy Within [...]

By: Donnieboy

Donnieboy — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:02:21 +0000

Just wanted to drop you a line to say, I enjoy reading your site. I thought about starting a blog myself but don’t have the time.
Oh well maybe one day….

By: Top Secret Writers : How Illuminati Symbols Connect to MJ-12

Top Secret Writers : How Illuminati Symbols Connect to MJ-12 — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:11:32 +0000

[...] as well as the identical principles outlined in the MJ-12 releases – which I described in a recent RU article . The specific elements that investigators should concentrate on, because it relates so closely to [...]

By: Top Secret Writers : One of the Top Internet Fraud Scams

Top Secret Writers : One of the Top Internet Fraud Scams — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:21:27 +0000

[...] the most important articles I’ve written at RealityUncovered in a very long time, about the philosophy behind the MJ-12 documents – and the evidence that the release of that information started around 1979 and [...]

By: RyanDube

RyanDube — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:42:38 +0000

Hi Kris – thanks for your comment. Feel free to quote or post, but make sure to link directly back to this page to provide proper credit for the source. Thanks!

By: KrisBelucci

KrisBelucci — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 01:41:49 +0000

I really liked this post. Can I copy it to my site? Thank you in advance.

By: Jessicaoxido

Jessicaoxido — Sun, 10 May 2009 14:50:54 +0000

Thanks for good post

By: Mur

Mur — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:19:14 +0000

I love you guys

By: RyanDube

RyanDube — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:19:25 +0000

I recall having this same conversation regarding Starstream, and your tendancy to draw sweeping conclusions based on obscure documents and putting it forth as “fact.” If you want to distinguish fact from opinion at the RU website, it’s simple. If we’ve published it in one of the articles, it’s fact and it’s supported by documentation and evidence, some of which may not be provided in full in the article for lack of space, but absolutely available to anyone who requests it. If there’s a particular statement that you feel isn’t a fact, then be specific and point it out – and we’ll be happy to provide you with the documentation that proves it. Your blanket statement about the RU website is a shallow and transparent attempt to discredit RU. Again – your efforts here are duly noted.

By: Gary Bekkum

Gary Bekkum — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:51:46 +0000

You often make statements without providing any supporting information. You also need to clarify where you are making statements based of fact as opposed to statements of opinion and belief. I find it is often difficult to distinguish fact from opinion at the RU website.