With the following post in particular shedding some more light on Richard Theilmann’s tale:
A convenient buddy

Lance

(A) Theilmann has a CAC, Navy, or similar badge that authorizes his general access to the base.

(B) Theilmann arranged with someone other than Maccabee to obtain a visitor’s pass.

(C) Theilmann accessed the base illegally.

However, in the larger context of determining whether this may or may not have been an “intelligence operation” (i.e. involving human intelligence asset(s)) distinguishing between the above possibilities would be more or less irrelevant.

And no, I am NOT saying this was an intelligence operation.

If this was an intelligence operation, then the Navy would probably be the cover (what is called a cut-out) service for another government agency or military service. As an example, the Navy offered to act as the funding cut-out for the CIA to covertly continue the Stanford Research Institute psychic spy work in the mid-1970s, in exchange for intelligence sharing.

Source A query Wednesday, June 2, 2010 5:23 PM
From: “brumac******” Add sender to Contacts
To: nyracum*******

To reiterate:
“A” had to have a badge of some sort to get into the lab without my help. This does not mean “special clearance ” or “special access” as would be required to get into a restricted area or to attend a classified meeting. (My meeting with him was “unclassified”.)
At NSWC anyone with a “common access card” (CAC) or some other type of Navy badge could get onto the base.
I assumed he had a high level of clearance based on what I was told by the Pickerings. When “A” told me that he could get onto the base without my help I assumed it was because he had a high level Navy clearance. However, the main response to your question is not what I assumed, but rather that fact that no special clearance level (such as Confidential, Secret or Top Secret) was required to simply get onto the base. But he had to have some sort of badge that the guards would recognize as giving him permission to enter the base. (A person does not just drive by the guards and wave one’s hand…. you
need an employee badge or some other type of Navy badge or a “CAC”.)
Once on the base a person could drive to any building. To enter some buildings required “special access”. However, anyone on the base could enter the area of the building that I was in. I merely gave him instructions on where to drive, where to park, which entrance to take to enter
the building I was in and how to get to the room I was in.

—–Original Message—–
From: caryn anscomb
To: brumac
Sent: Wed, Jun 2, 2010 12:02 pm
Subject: Source A query

Hi Bruce,

Sorry to bring up the Source A controversy again, but I wonder if could clarify a point for me?

Gary Bekkun recently forwarded an email from yourself – please see below – which states that Theilmann did not need special clearance to gain access to you in your office on base. Yet in an article released by Salla, and a recorded interview you made for the Open Minds Forum, you state that Theilmann did need special clearance to access you in your office.

There is now growing speculation – initiated by Salla? – that you are being pressured by someone above you to change your statement. Could you please clarify the discrepancies between your earlier statement and the email you sent to Gary Bekkum?

Many thanks in advance.

Caryn

“Dr” Salla s reputation is now utterly destroyed. Oh well… lucky he has his wife who can speak to Dolphins as a way to earn a living. Nice one Mike

And doesn’t that speak volumes and lend itself well to theories of cullusion between Salla/Theilmann & the Pickerings. I also can’t believe there are still folk discussing the ‘UN UFO’ meeting on OMF as if a given fact when it has already been disproved….Exactly why Salla encouraged the Pickerings to join and post on a less “gratuitous debunking and mud slinging” site-OM…If any other OM forum members are thinking along the same lines as dear Bob above, perhaps you should start checking your lifeboats now-after all, it was OM that was targeted!

Yes, Richard Dolan is an excellent historiographer…all the more reason for the “boys” to cuddle up to him and feed him lies about “reptillian ET’s in collusion with the government” and “imminent disclosure”. It is hard to debunk Richard’s research, so why not draw him into the hornet’s nest? Richard, please be wary! They are attempting to control you the way they have attempted (unsuccessfully) to control Dr. Edgar Mitchell and Jesse Marcel, Jr. . Beware of those who tell you that ET “poses a potentially grave threat”. Leave that to Stephen Hawking and his “masters”. You are infinitely more intelligent than Hawkings, based upon his recent “pay-back” performance. Please understand that Bruce MacAbee is being replaced by Bernard Haisch as the “go to guy” by CNN, Fox, etc., in order to minimize the truth about ET. And he works with Dr. Edgar Mitchell! You and Edgar are surrounded by vipers. Please do not let you “quaint” ideas about patriotism and national sovereignty feed into the paranoia that is being dished out by NSA, CIA, DOD, MOD, etc. . They will destroy YOUR credibility. Please be careful.

It is most likely that this vetting of Source A is part of a much larger “program” to control the disclosure movement. By making Disclosure people look crazy (which isn’t hard to do), they spin the story, and then retract it (much like redacting a story). Perhaps the whole story has been spun and unspun to distract from the Stephenville Lights, and Dr. Edgar Mitchell’s request of Barack O’Bama to release the secret U.S. UFO files. It would not be surprising for John Alexander to go on the Veritas Radio Show soon to say what should BE OBVIOUS TO MOST PEOPLE now:That disclosure is not going to happen, according to John (read:CIA), because of people like Source A, Stephen Greer/Orion Project, and Gordon Novell/Hal Putoff’s Alpha Centuri Project. John Alexander would have you believe that he is for disclosure, when he is controlling non-disclosue! Dr. Alexander spins the yarn with his buddies Webre and Salla (and Source A & Pickerings), and then discredits the Disclosure/Exopolitical Movement (as well as Dr. Edgar Mitchell). Why does Salla and Webre discredit the Exopolitical movement? It is because they control it for the National Security State!

The game has been played forever, especially since the Roswell crashes of 1947. MJ-12 is alive and well, if only another name.

Note: There is no real divide between the believer and non-believer as the hoaxers, con-men & detractors of truth seekers would like to promote – the divide is between the discerning and non-discerning….and some of the most discerning amongst us are themselves experiencers of the phenomenon, to one degree or another. That places anyone promoting the type of hype coming from the Exopo camps et-al in a very precarious position….