With the following post in particular shedding some more light on Richard Theilmann’s tale:
A convenient buddy

Please understand me. I’m not questioning the RU expose either. I’m saying, Here’s a guy who’s a member of the Navy League and a member of a church who posts porno–specifically it seems to me he would have been ostracized from those social circles for that.

This is really bothering me cause apparently he is in the Navy League, is a church member and does post porno. Is there anyone who can explain this?

Elaine Douglass

Name, Rank, and serial number
Identity, Discipline, Order
Source A, Circe, seer say
Commander, Controller, Conformer
Executive, Legislative, Judicial

…waiting for a number to drop…

Caryn wrote:

“I understand your frustration Dan..and yes it is tedious but we have a playing card house senario here…The house is resting on Theilmann’s credibility. If and I am saying IF it is discovered that Theilmann has fabricated his history/credentials etc the house comes crashing down…if it is established that he has been telling the truth about his own military history credentials etc, it will lend significance to the larger story….others participating here fully comprehend what is to be lost and what is to be gained from ascertaining the facts and evidence in either case.”

I would actually expect the exact opposite. if Theilmann’s credentials check out, then the possibility of a hoax increases, IMHO. On the other hand, if he is a “dangle” being offered to the UFO community (for whatever purpose) then I would expect he would be acting in the role of ‘cut-out’ — and his ‘official’ credentials would be valid only to the extent the cut-out service was willing to absorb the embarrassing fall out of his ‘outing’ on the Internet.

If this is not the case, and the allegations made by the research team turned out to be true (which would have happened in time if left alone), then what was gained by the exposure at this time?

If, on the other hand, the analysis and conclusions are indeed faulty, then what are the consequences of this premature release of information (not knowledge — data set in a context of the team’s analysis)?

I believe your action fails the test of altruistic motivation in the decision to publish the findings (and by Andrew’s own words, 4 out of 5 members of the team felt it was premature), and is therefore highly suspect.

Yes, Richard is an excellent historiographer. However, he is being “controlled” by the likes of Salla, Webre and Alexander. Richard, please be wary! They are trying to control you as they have attempted to control Dr. Edgar Mitchell and Jesse marcel, Jr. . Beware of those saying that ET’s “potentially pose a grave threat”. Please understand that Bruce Macabee is being replaced by a scientiest’s of Mitchell’s, ie., Bernard Haisch. You are surrounded by vipers. Do not allow your “quaint” ideas of patriotism and national soverignty be fed by paranoia spread by NSA, CIA, DOD spooks. You do not need them, Richard. They will destroy your credibility!

It is quite possible that this vetting of source A is part of a much larger “program” to control; the disclosure movement. By making Disclosure advocates liook crazy, they spin the story, and then rtetract it. Perhaps the whole story has been spun and unspun to distract from the recent work of Dr. Edgar Mitchell asking President Barack O’Bama to release the secret UFO files. It would not be surprising for John Alexander to go on Veritas Radio soon to say what should be obvious to most now:That disclosure is not going to occur because of people like Source A, Stephen Greer/Orion Project, or Gordon Novell/Hal Putoff “Alpha Centuri” project. Dr. Alexander spins the yarn with Webre and Salla, and Source A, and then discredits Mitchell and the Disclosure Movement, yet again.

Yes, The as Dick Farley states:More psyops, like Lawrence Rockefeller’s “Disclosure Project”. Please understand that Stephen greer was used by these people, and while he is far from honest about being used by Lawrence Rockefeller, Edward Teller, John Alexander, Bob Bigelow, etc., he is right:ET poses no threat. Please understand this simple but basic truth (Richard Dolen). As Dick Farley knows, Scott Jones, Bruce Macabee and John Alexander are part of the Aviary to confound the Disclosure Movement. NIDS and Bigelow are deeply involved, as is George Knapp. However, as Dick Farley knows:Roswell were crashedd UFO’s and “the pilots were not from earth” (General Harry Cordes). That makes even Mr. Farley an agent de proveceteur and psyop agent in my book. And Mr. Morningstar, stop with the disinformation.