Serpo

The ones that didn't get away

Moderators: ryguy, chrLz, Zep Tepi

Serpo

Postby dragonfire » Sun May 21, 2006 4:21 pm

Serpo,

Is this, after recent events, the first to fall :?:

I think I heard a thud :shock:
Irritating the world, one person at a time
dragonfire
Latrine Only
 
Posts: 262
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 5:41 pm
Location: NC, USA


Postby I.P.Freely » Sun Jun 18, 2006 5:31 pm

I.m still waiting for proof that its anything other then what its seems to be just a stupid story
I.P.Freely
Clearly Discerns Reality
Clearly Discerns Reality
 
Posts: 611
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 8:48 pm

Postby Shawnna » Sun Jun 18, 2006 6:05 pm

deleted
Last edited by Shawnna on Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Shawnna
Uncovers Reality
Uncovers Reality
 
Posts: 1243
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:30 pm

Postby I.P.Freely » Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:08 am

Don,t get me wrong I believe more likely then not its a hoax but I won,t commit to that on what I ,ve seen. Because when I Can copy and paste with changed text so easy how can you expect me to regard that as proof. Its a little insulting to expect me to believe it is tamper proof evidence.


OrgName: Eben Communications Corporation
OrgID: QCC-22
Address: 1801 California Dreaming Street
City: Denver
StateProv: CO
PostalCode: 80202
Country: US

NetRange: 70.56.0.0 - 99.00.999.000
CIDR: 70.56.0.0/14
NetName: QWEST-INET-117
NetHandle: NET-70-56-0-0-1
Parent: NET-70-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Allocation
NameServer: AUTHNS1.MPLS.SERPO.NET
NameServer: AUTHNS2.DNVR.SERPO.NET
NameServer: AUTHNS3.STTL.SERPO.NET
Comment:
RegDate: 2004-06-18
Updated: 2006-02-09


OrgName: Qwest Communications Corporation
OrgID: QCC-22
Address: 1801 California Street
City: Denver
StateProv: CO
PostalCode: 80202
Country: US

NetRange: 71.32.0.0 - 71.39.255.255
CIDR: 71.32.0.0/13
NetName: QWEST-INET-119
NetHandle: NET-71-32-0-0-1
Parent: NET-71-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Allocation
NameServer: AUTHNS1.MPLS.QWEST.NET
NameServer: AUTHNS2.DNVR.QWEST.NET
NameServer: AUTHNS3.STTL.QWEST.NET
Comment:
RegDate: 2004-12-17
Updated: 2006-02-09
I.P.Freely
Clearly Discerns Reality
Clearly Discerns Reality
 
Posts: 611
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 8:48 pm

Postby Shawnna » Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:21 am

deleted
Last edited by Shawnna on Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Shawnna
Uncovers Reality
Uncovers Reality
 
Posts: 1243
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:30 pm

Postby dragonfire » Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:26 am

And to that add, some "others" aren't apparently giving up hope yet either. The story still seems to carry a relative few who won't let go. I must admit, no REAL evidence has been put forward that the WHOLE of the story is BS. Just some of the ones behind it.

This just isn't going away that easily :wink:
Irritating the world, one person at a time
dragonfire
Latrine Only
 
Posts: 262
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 5:41 pm
Location: NC, USA

Postby Zep Tepi » Mon Jun 19, 2006 7:59 am

Just so you know, I've forwarded the original Anonymous email to a moderator at the OM forum.

I thought it was telling enough that none of our proof has been denied by the people involved, but obviously not.

The original email is fully intact and is in the same condition as when it was originally received. They can carry out their own analysis to verify no tampering has taken place.

Cheers,
Zep
.
Image
User avatar
Zep Tepi
1 of the RU3
 
Posts: 2150
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 12:59 pm

Postby I.P.Freely » Mon Jun 19, 2006 8:10 am

No Miss I don,t mean to Imply that at all But if I remember right were not the source of the emails Mr. Martinez ? Am I wrong to believe that many here do not hold him in high regard? But you trust this information from him? Do you see why I just don,t think It matters If it was tampered with but that it can so easiely that it should be discarded. Just my opinion
I.P.Freely
Clearly Discerns Reality
Clearly Discerns Reality
 
Posts: 611
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 8:48 pm

Postby I.P.Freely » Mon Jun 19, 2006 8:20 am

Zep Tepi wrote:Just so you know, I've forwarded the original Anonymous email to a moderator at the OM forum.

I thought it was telling enough that none of our proof has been denied by the people involved, but obviously not.

The original email is fully intact and is in the same condition as when it was originally received. They can carry out their own analysis to verify no tampering has taken place.

Cheers,
Zep


Please don,t get wrong I have no reason to believe that any thing has been tampered with but the fact that it can Is just the point I am trying to make. Thats all
I.P.Freely
Clearly Discerns Reality
Clearly Discerns Reality
 
Posts: 611
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 8:48 pm

Postby Zep Tepi » Mon Jun 19, 2006 9:29 am

Thanks for the clarification, I understand your point :)

Cheers,
Zep
.
Image
User avatar
Zep Tepi
1 of the RU3
 
Posts: 2150
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 12:59 pm

Postby ochre » Sun Jul 30, 2006 5:26 am

Seems it's about time to add the OM mess here.

I feel sad. I didn't agree with much said over there, but I had a bit of fun and even liked some of the people there. And now I wonder if there ever was more than 1 or 2 people there at any time... This is just weird.
cartoonsyndicalist
ochre
On A Quest for Reality
On A Quest for Reality
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 3:36 am
Location: Greater Scandinavia

Postby Shawnna » Sun Jul 30, 2006 5:33 am

deleted
Last edited by Shawnna on Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Shawnna
Uncovers Reality
Uncovers Reality
 
Posts: 1243
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:30 pm

Postby ochre » Sun Jul 30, 2006 6:57 am

You just keep peeling away (and keep up the fine job), but I'm starting to think there may not be anything at all beneath those layers.
cartoonsyndicalist
ochre
On A Quest for Reality
On A Quest for Reality
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 3:36 am
Location: Greater Scandinavia


Google

Return to Famous Hoaxes

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest