Hello everyone,
I have posted an article on the website here that discusses the controversial Truman Forrestal Memo - part of the infamous Majestic 12 documents.
Let me know what you think by posting your thoughts in this thread.
Cheers,
Zep
Moderators: ryguy, chrLz, Zep Tepi
Zep Tepi wrote:Hello everyone,
I have posted an article on the website here that discusses the controversial Truman Forrestal Memo - part of the infamous Majestic 12 documents.
Let me know what you think by posting your thoughts in this thread.
Cheers,
Zep
cartoonsyndicate wrote:Zep Tepi wrote:Hello everyone,
I have posted an article on the website here that discusses the controversial Truman Forrestal Memo - part of the infamous Majestic 12 documents.
Let me know what you think by posting your thoughts in this thread.
Cheers,
Zep
My own belief is that the Truman Forestal memorandum is genuine but altered. The Truman signature on the extant document is obviously a faked copy- Ryan Wood’s awkward pantograph theory notwithstanding.
But consider this:
It is a well known courtroom method in both direct and cross examination that by discrediting a single point of testimony the entire testimony is impeached.
The substitution, i.e 'planting' of a copied signature- containing the ‘white-out flaws’- for the original signature was done as an invitation to forensic analysts to impeach a single point of fact and thereby the entire testimony- in this case the field of Ufology in toto. (It would have been assumed with high confidence by disinfo agents that the document used as the source of the copied signature would have been discovered by such a thorough and tenacious researcher as Stan Friedman. This, in fact, did happen.) The disinfo ploy seems to have worked. It brought Stan Friedman and the entire body of MJ12 docs under a cloud of suspicion from which they have never fully recovered.
Was this a Bill Moore/ Rick Doty operation? Who knows?
Best, Kim
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests