Just wanted to introduce you to this project and ask you if you know any similar projects in your own country ?
In recent years, many researchers of unknown aerial phenomena have adopted new terminology that reflects a rational thought, based on research methods will be instrumental in explaining how technical a particular phenomenon which is manifested in various parts of the world: UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena).
Major international research institutions are concerned about suspected cases of UAP, including French GEIPAN (Groupement d'Etude et d'Information sur les Phénomènes Aérospatiaux non-identifiés), the NARCAP (National Aviation Reporting Center on Anomalous Phenomena), the Project HESSDALEN and CIPH (Italian Committee Draft Hessdalen), using scientific methods to the study of any data obtained.
The UAP-Italy Project is a research project directed by Nicola Tosi of Research Center Modena Apennines, in alliance with 45 ° GRU (Research Group UAP of Polesine, Veneto), who for many years devoted to the weekly tracking some Italian areas of particular interest, where anomalous luminous phenomena occur regularly in the lower atmosphere. Both groups are uniting their forces and their methods of research have led to an "operational database, trying to disclose the technical thought for the field study of these phenomena and at the same time expanding the" network "of research in other areas Italy.
The term UAP then assumes a scientific / instrumental value of inquiry in the context of those phenomena classified as suspected UFO
Source : http://www.projectuap-italia.org/Project.htm
Here is the 45° GRU : http://www.45gru.it/
Here is the LTPA Observer Project : http://www.ltpaobserverproject.com/
and their research methodology : http://www.projectuap-italia.org/Englis ... ersion.pdf
Unfortunately, I noticed a flaw in the LTPA's methodology, they only use one camera per site to record/capture "anomalous" events. By using two or three in different locations, one could not only almost make sure that no artefacts or biologicals (i.e : cosmic rays, lens flares, noise in the camera, insects, birds, etc...) get on the way but would also obtain enough data to proceed to an eventual triangulation.
Separating artefacts from possible physical events is not only one of the steps in the analyzing process but also a top priority.
But regardless of this fact, they do seem to record quiet a few "anomalous" events with their systems.
Interesting...
Cheers,
Buck