gunter wrote:Screw it. He's essentially a kind and empathetic man.
Who has no clue, nor experience, in leading. His idea of leadership is giving good teleprompter, and his naive and mistaken belief was that was all that was necessary to "lead the sheeple" to his wonderous new world of hope-n-change. Even the liberal-dem dopes in Europe have not bought his snake oil! That right there is EPIC FAIL. He is an empty suit.
What more could we ask for to help mitigate the pain of the Bushist meat-grinder?
Oh, I dunno.... how about this list as a start:
1) Keeping your promises of change, and especially transparency (he and his operators have failed in that one terribly).
2) Taking responsibility instead just blaming the other party/past adminisation (which is the very definition of NON-CHANGE in the political domain).
3) Actually being a "reach across the aisle" centrist, instead of just believing he is in his own head. (You do remember he was assessed as THE MOST LIBERAL member of the Senate, don't you?)
4) Revealing his OWN convictions (all those things he wrote in school that he is keeping in Al Gore's "lock box") and seeing if they will float with the American people, rather than just doing what the extreme left of his party demands (via Nancy and Harry).
This last one is the most telling, for as much as people disliked how Bush merely catered to the religious right of his party (and I did not like this about him either), Obama is doing the exact same, brain-dead thing with the looney left extreme of his own party. It is the pendulum swing that I have talked about many times in this thread, and 180 degree phase shifts are anything but good for a neutrally-stable system such as our political climate in this country. It promotes divergence, not convergence. And we see the exact same hypocrisy in Congress. Back when Dems were in the minority, all we heard from nails-on-the-board-screeching Nancy was how they were being treated unfairly, and how they would never do this to the Repubs if they were in control. Which we now have evidence that it was just more political lies, for they close-out Republican ideas (and the hope of centrist balance) at every opportunity. The mantra and talking points of the left have loved to say the Repubs have "no ideas", and this is patently false. The problem is that media rarely reports on all the motions brought by the minority party (no matter who is the majority), and the majority power bases their "no ideas" only on the motions that are carried, and never count the motions that are defeated (along party lines).
But then again, I would never expect for you to engage in a real, honest political dialectic (as much as you claim for that to be the center of your philosophy). No, for hypocrites like you, it is enough to simply "do the Bush Bash" dance, and ignore anything uncomfortable about the aholes you vote for.
Ray