gunter wrote:Did we see anyone prosecuted for exposing Valerie Plame?
Yes, we did. Or do you just blot things out of your memory that do not serve your worldview? Scooter Libby anyone?
Ray
Moderators: ryguy, chrLz, Zep Tepi
gunter wrote:Did we see anyone prosecuted for exposing Valerie Plame?
gunter wrote:He was just a fall guy.
Why wasn't his boss prosecuted?
And why did your guy Dumbya commute his sentence?
He was not procecuted under the law that Steve cited- (Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982 (Pub.L. 97-200, 50 U.S.C. § 421–426). He was prosecuted for perjury.
Zep Tepi wrote:That there was a cover up is not in doubt. Past tense.
Well- just as I said- no-one was prosecuted for outing Valery Plame. The real reason had nothing to do with 'lack of evidence'- it was all about avoiding the discovery process. The government has a vested interest in protecting its secrets.They did the best they could with the evidence they had. That is all one can expect from a prosecutor, unless you live in an ideal world, which you tend to like to spend a lot of time in.
gunter wrote:You really think the coverup is 'past tense?' Well- hallelujah! We've had disclosure. How could we have missed it? Someone oughta tell Rich Dolan he's wasting his time, eh?
gunter wrote:Well- just as I said- no-one was prosecuted for outing Valery Plame.
The real reason had nothing to do with 'lack of evidence'- it was all about avoiding the discovery process.
The government has a vested interest in protecting its secrets.
Pam... thanks for your feedback. Read as far as this part where you are saying:
- It has shown that RT has a Facebook Page (nothing to deconstruct here)
- It has shown that RT has a Myspace Page (nothing to deconstruct here)
Can you prove to us that RT actually set up those accounts? Is there any tangible evidence backing up those claims that those are his accounts that he set up himself?
blah blah blah...etc. etc.
Ray
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest