Page 1 of 55

OMF and the Hoax

PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 4:19 pm
by murnut
This thread primarily will be about the Theilmann hoax or prank, but you could throw Slurpo or other in here also.

It appears OMF is heading in the right direction...but appearances can be deceiving.

Quoting 99

Just hope they have checked their accident insurance to see if it's paid up. A couple of bodyguards watching 24/7 would not be a bad idea either. That place-we-must-not-name is chock full of people who, let's just say based on the er.. tone of their comments, should be taken very seriously; no question about that -- IMHO. However, having said this, they brought this down on themselves and from my understanding they knew all along how everything was going to end... at least the first phase of it which clearly is over.
PS -- I don't know if anyone here yet has given them any warnings about those possibilities mentioned above but, just for the record, I'm telling it to them now via this post. :-/
« Last Edit: Today at 2:51pm by agent99 »



So much for OM's zero tolerance policy.....99 just gave it the finger and it shows just how impotent the omf admins really are.

Re: OMF and the Hoax

PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 4:24 pm
by murnut
This post by Jake continues with the bizarre behavior trend

http://lucianarchy.proboards.com/index. ... =23#265883

He posts some email from Bob Collins....I'd say Jake is clinging by a thread to his IC theory.

Why Jake?

Re: OMF and the Hoax

PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:46 pm
by TheShadow
Hey Andy,
Nice to see you here. I have to say i have never paid any attention to the whole source A nonsense. It was obvious to me this was nothing from the beginning and i wasted enough time on Serpo and the ridiculous drones to have learned the entire UFO/ dislclosure issue will never lead to any substantial evidence of alien visitation.

When the mods from OM sent out an email talking about RU slandering them i figured i would wander over here and see what was up! Nice to see you have done your due dillegence and exposed the frauds for what they are. Great work!

Re: OMF and the Hoax

PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 8:11 pm
by spect8or
Hey Andy,

Here's something to add for their unwavering acceptance of 99.

Although there have been multiple assurances that moderation will be balanced, the favoritism at Open Minds Forum continues.

@2:51pm - Agent99 makes a very serious accusation. (Sorry for the cutoff but you get the point)

Image

@4:09 - I ask her to expand on this.

Image

@4:16 - Nearly immediately, I am asked by Doc not to go there.

Image

I question Doc's reasoning to warn me and assure him of the validity of my question as being on topic.

Image

At this point, I am temporarily banned from the site for maybe 5 minutes. Once I am allowed back in, Doc has this response for me.

Image

Being absolutely blown away at the pure favoritism in this response I give my last post to Open Minds Forum.

Image

Of course, the favoritism was clear to me before this episode, however I think it further pushes the point home. How can a forum that continuously isolates its members stay afloat? It can't. Of course, none of what transpired remains there, it was deleted ... that is, except for agent99's post. Surprising?

I hate to say it, but I will probably continue to lurk there. But we all know how we love to watch a train wreck.

Anyway, nice to be where cooler minds prevail.

Re: OMF and the Hoax

PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 8:13 pm
by ryguy
haha...the rubberneck syndrome. I keep trying to cure the rest of the team of that affliction but no one listens to me. :)

Re: OMF and the Hoax

PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 8:16 pm
by spect8or
ryguy wrote:haha...the rubberneck syndrome. I keep trying to cure the rest of the team of that affliction but no one listens to me. :)


Yeah yeah ... well, certainly is entertaining. But one can only take so much hypocrisy.

Great work BTW, to you and the whole team.

Re: OMF and the Hoax

PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 8:22 pm
by suspicioso
The Shadow Returns! Great to see you here shads...the drones were quite good harmless fun really. Or at least, compared to this.

Re: OMF and the Hoax

PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 9:35 pm
by AussieMike
Clearly jake is himself a conman, and it explains why he identifys with RT and the Pickles.

For example he posts RT "saw" his brother killed in an <accident>

You can see how hes using language to paint a picture, but like the RT story, this picture is false.

RT did not "see" his brothers helicopter crash, and note how he trys to promote the not an accident meme.

Isolating the word accident, and then making comments about Roberts piloting prowess insinuating that his skills would preclude an accident, and alluding to a more sinister explaination.....Surface to air missiles ?

The word Spin is often used in association with jakes comments, but the word Con is more apropos

Re: OMF and the Hoax

PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 9:36 pm
by jeddyhi
Hey shads ole buddy, where the hell you been? Great to hear from ya!

Re: OMF and the Hoax

PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 9:45 pm
by AussieMike
And i see dragonfart is in full deflection mode again

According to the Investigating Team, Maccabee is the one that verified the picture and had a meeting with RT.

What was the meeting about?

How is Maccabee involved in all this?

How did RT get on the base?

Never mind the Navy Yacht club



Dr Mac has already explained that his office wasnt a secure location, that anyone on base, could just walk in, and we know getting on base as a visitor isnt all that hard to do.

Never mind the Navy Yacht club


Of course the ostrich gambit again, because its from this direction we have proof RT is a fraud, proof they cant poke holes in, he got into the club via the naval order, who have made a statement that RT is a fraud, of course if you cant poke holes in it, you bury it, hence the never mind comment.

Its telling isnt it that an admin is suggesting ppl ignore an aspect of the case that proves beyond a shadow of a doubt the fact that RT is a fraud.

In doing so, they are promoting the false meme that RT was a military man (which he wasnt, we know this from so many independant sources now its beyond a doubt. the records centre and VA, his familiy, the naval order, the FBI)

In promoting this false meme, they are deliberatly and directly shortchanging the real heroes, people who earned their symbols of courage and valor the hard way.

They are promoting a liar and a coward.......ah well birds of a feather flock together

Re: OMF and the Hoax

PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 9:56 pm
by AussieMike
This from the comments section of the blog

As for 5000 members….. well their latest poll as to whether Source is a hoax or not has attracted 37 votes and its been running the best part of a week.



=D>

Well spotted Jay

Re: OMF and the Hoax

PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 10:53 pm
by AussieMike
murnut wrote:Quoting 99

Just hope they have checked their accident insurance to see if it's paid up. A couple of bodyguards watching 24/7 would not be a bad idea either. That place-we-must-not-name is chock full of people who, let's just say based on the er.. tone of their comments, should be taken very seriously; no question about that -- IMHO. However, having said this, they brought this down on themselves and from my understanding they knew all along how everything was going to end... at least the first phase of it which clearly is over.
PS -- I don't know if anyone here yet has given them any warnings about those possibilities mentioned above but, just for the record, I'm telling it to them now via this post. :-/
« Last Edit: Today at 2:51pm by agent99 »



So much for OM's zero tolerance policy.....99 just gave it the finger and it shows just how impotent the omf admins really are.


Understand the zero tolerance policy should have been posted as the zero tolerance policy towards those who dont support the lies. the Policy does not apply to Everyone.....Just a selected few

Cross posting is also against policy

As far as I know, after Crystal posted several derogatory comments about the administration and mods here at OM a few times at that-place-that-must-not-be-named ... where she then said that she dropped out of this forum


But 99 is free to do it without repercussion, The mods wont touch her, she is a liar and so she encouraged.

OMF is a Disinfo site, Liars are encouraged. Ppl who question the lies are banned.

Thats the policy, and everyone can see it, they dont try and hide it, from what i can see are proud of it.

They are a blight on the field of Ufology

Re: OMF and the Hoax

PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 11:27 pm
by oboe
AussieMike wrote:Isolating the word accident, and then making comments about Roberts piloting prowess insinuating that his skills would preclude an accident, and alluding to a more sinister explaination.....Surface to air missiles ?

The word Spin is often used in association with jakes comments, but the word Con is more apropos


Actually, Mike, I find it odd that such an accident occurred, given both pilots were very experienced pilots. The accident was labeled pilot error, according to the below article. I'm not saying it was anything like SAMs, but I just think it's a weird accident for experienced pilots.

http://legacy.signonsandiego.com/uniont ... crash.html

Re: OMF and the Hoax

PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 11:31 pm
by oboe
AussieMike wrote:This from the comments section of the blog

As for 5000 members….. well their latest poll as to whether Source is a hoax or not has attracted 37 votes and its been running the best part of a week.


=D>

Well spotted Jay


Ha! Bren probably has 1000 socks there. And the people who have been banned but never deleted their accounts are still shown as members.

Re: OMF and the Hoax

PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 11:37 pm
by AussieMike
oboe wrote:
AussieMike wrote:Isolating the word accident, and then making comments about Roberts piloting prowess insinuating that his skills would preclude an accident, and alluding to a more sinister explaination.....Surface to air missiles ?

The word Spin is often used in association with jakes comments, but the word Con is more apropos


Actually, Mike, I find it odd that such an accident occurred, given both pilots were very experienced pilots. The accident was labeled pilot error, according to the below article. I'm not saying it was anything like SAMs, but I just think it's a weird accident for experienced pilots.

http://legacy.signonsandiego.com/uniont ... crash.html


It happens, military helicopters collide

Townsville’s Black Hawk collision remembered


http://www.defence.gov.au/news/armynews ... ture01.htm

This is a local example, and again a night time scenario.

I honestly think Richard promotes the SAM scenario , because his brother was one of the pilots.
denial is one of the common reactions to grief.

Of course as the Australian example shows, these things happen, it was an accident, being a military pilot is a dangerous job, there is always an element of risk, especially at night