Aviary Threats In Response to our Update?

[dan]

Well, anyway, it has recently been suggested that there should be a ryan dube defense team, in the event of a possible backlash......Jack S might also be in need of such from his recent activities.

[wetsystems]

I think neither requires a defense although I haven't followed Sarfatti's nihilist, neo-con rants lately. In the words of the great Dan Quayle: "A mind is a terrible thing to lose."

Have i told you lately how much I admire your equanimity?

[dan]

I've been told that it goes with the territory........

[wetsystems]

I've been told that it goes with the territory........

Told by whom? Everything you write references a categorical Ontologism. That's not a bad thing- but neither is it a true thing. It contains, though, a certain conceit which might invalidate your entire exegesis. And exegesis it is. You rely on the Christian mythos for the subtext of your hypothesis. No zero sum analysis here. This is my objection.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

Best,

cs

[caryn]

Well, anyway, it has recently been suggested that there should be a ryan dube defense team, in the event of a possible backlash......Jack S might also be in need of such from his recent activities.

Ryan has people around him he can rely on - but thanks for the 'sincere' concern!

Didn't notice you leaping in to defend Jack btw.

[wetsystems]

dan wrote:

I've been told that it goes with the territory........


Told by whom? Everything you write references a categorical Ontologism. That's not a bad thing- but neither is it a true thing. It contains, though, a certain conceit which might invalidate your entire exegesis. And exegesis it is. You rely on the Christian mythos for the subtext of your hypothesis. No zero sum analysis here. This is my objection.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

Best,

cs

[wetsystems]

Well, anyway, it has recently been suggested that there should be a ryan dube defense team, in the event of a possible backlash......Jack S might also be in need of such from his recent activities.

Ryan has people around him he can rely on - but thanks for the 'sincere' concern!

Didn't notice you leaping in to defend Jack btw.

No, I can't defend Jack except that I would defend his right say his schtick. And what of this "sincere concern"? I don't believe that I ever indicated thus. Let me ask you- are you having a breakdown?

And, as I recall, Jack is no big fan of Dan Smith. Correct me if I'm wrong.

[caryn]

You'll see my response was directed at Dan, Mr K, if you look again.

You kidding? Jack loves Dan Smith!

[wetsystems]

You'll see my response was directed at Dan, Mr K, if you look again.

You kidding? Jack loves Dan Smith!

hahahahah! so was mine! I hadn't even noticed that you were here. Sorry! Jack has pissed me off irrevocably. Caryn, he's become a neocon Bushist. Let's let the chips fall where they may.

[dan]

Wet,

Told by whom? Everything you write references a categorical Ontologism. That's not a bad thing- but neither is it a true thing. It contains, though, a certain conceit which might invalidate your entire exegesis. And exegesis it is. You rely on the Christian mythos for the subtext of your hypothesis. No zero sum analysis here. This is my objection.

‘I’ve been told‘……yes, that was a ‘conceit’….I didn’t realize how serious a one until you took the trouble to point it out.

‘…rely on the Christian mythos…’ ‘Rely’ is the wrong word. I find that it is unavoidable, given the premises of the BPWH. It fits too well with those premises: minimal intervention, co-creation, eschatology, etc.

The major traditions can be ignored no more than can a scientist ignore gravity.

Dan

[wetsystems]

given the premises of the BPWH

'Presupposition' is more apt. And, of course they are 'avoidable.' 'Traditions' are of no value in a philosophical analysis. They are simply dross. And what of a phenominalogical theory that does not presuppose 'gravity?' Perhaps 'gravity' is simply the manefestation 'ethics' Or the cosmological 'mood.' Zero sum. The whole of existence is subject to new analysis once we overcome operative categories.

[ryguy]

Ryan has people around him he can rely on - but thanks for the 'sincere' concern!

Thanks Caryn

"The man who fears no truths has nothing to fear from lies."
- Sir Francis Bacon

Cheers,
-Ry

[dan]

Yesterday Ron said that Kit might attempt to retaliate against Ryan by calling his employer.

[Zep Tepi]

Retaliate against what, exactly?

[dan]

Retaliate against what, exactly?

The impending "Major Update".