Chorlton wrote:I am seriously questioning time and energy I have spent researching several UK scamsters and the big question is, whats the point?
Chorlton wrote:Im just having serious doubts ,as to if researching anything these days is worth the trouble?.
It would seem people feel a real need to believe in something and they will believe in it no matter how ridiculous (Reptilians, Zeta Reticulans).
Should one set out to enlighten them or leave them in their ignorant bliss?
MikeJamieson wrote:You're right: there's no changing a gullible marketplace.
Would it not be better (and perhaps more effective) to calmly state your side of reality with
facts and evidence displayed not in a hateful and spiteful way, but a fun and educational way?
caleban wrote:Zorgon actually got a rise out of Zep Tepi. I thought only Gary could do that.
Kudos to both John and Zorgon. Your debate tactics are smooth and worth
examination. Too bad that our side is being led by the nose, by their own prejudice,
emotions, and well practiced insults. If that does not change soon, I will have
to say that Zorgon and John have entered the lions den and shown the lion to
be a pussycat.
caleban wrote:The first point we scored is that I suspect you two are
having as much fun as the rest here but on a more cognitive level. That is something
which I hope can be reversed.
The second point we have scored so far is that you two are still here. That is a point at risk of forfeiture still. That is the point which determines whether the ideals of this site can survive or not. That is an excellent test "of the emergency broadcast system". Thank you for that !
What's your game then?
Bottom line is we need each other... or there is little point to any argument.
It does not mean however that one has to tolerate abuse.
Zep Tepi wrote: I'm sorry, but actual content and substance takes precedence over "smooth tactics" b.s. any day of the week. I'm surprised you don't agree.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests