mojo wrote:seriously though, i'd like to post some theories i have regarding ancient civs and archaeology and history but not really sure what forum they'd fit into here.
Stay tuned…

torbjon wrote:Doesn't really do much to deny ignorance though...
Certainly not when your well thought out presentation or rebuttal gets buried by a mountain of AOL "me too" posts and other assorted nonsense… hardly seems worth the effort.
The threads I enjoyed participating in at ATS involved maybe only a handful or so of “core” posters either “for” or “against” a particular topic that all involved were obviously passionate and knowledgeable about… now 95% or more of the stuff posted there I don’t understand how anyone who’s being intellectually honest would want themselves to be associated with. I don’t know, maybe it was already that way when I stumbled in there and I just didn’t realize it…
What I enjoy about at RU (and the only reason why I still share my $0.02 on these topics after my traumatic experience with willful ignorance at ATS lol) is the relaxed pace and high signal to noise ratio… everyone who chooses to participate has a voice… that is if they can handle the scrutiny and can humbly ascribe that which can’t be supported by evidence to mere belief.

[or opinion depending on the subject]
I think there’s a lot to be said for quality over quantity and with a little more quality (read a few more passionate and knowledgeable posters with alternative points of view to keep things interesting) I think this place could finally begin to pay for itself… we already have a fairly high readership to active participant ratio as far as obscure forums go which tells me collectively we must be doing something “right” and there’s a few folks out there who enjoy watching our little train wreck.

Men go and come but Earth abides.