Moderators: ryguy, chrLz, Zep Tepi
Jews pretend to be monotheistic, god-abiding citizens, but privately hold feelings of reprisal towards him. They developed an opposite deism to that of the Pleiadeans, in which they worship the anti-creator, the enemy of the 'good one': "In order to reach the level of the Creator, [...] we must come to feel that our desire is totally opposite that of the Creator."[8]
DeltaT wrote:A staged assault by an off-planet civilization could happen soon. False flag operations are covert operations which are designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities.
Link to article
Bobbox1980 wrote:@ ryguy - I think racism is as dumb as the next guy but you would actually email Google over this? Reliving your days as hall monitor?
Bobbox1980 wrote:…we all heard about Reagan's 'if aliens attack it would unite the planet speech'…
Bobbox1980 wrote:….so it is not beyond the realm of possibility that with the goal of uniting the world in mind a false flag alien attack could occur at some point in the future.
Bobbox1980 wrote:You don't need the opinion of someone in academia to come to this conclusion.
Tim Hebert wrote:Government pulling off an "alien" false flag operation rather low? Very insightful since the only guy that came close was Orson Welles back in 1938.
Bobbox1980 wrote:I'd give the chances of human governments wanting to and being able to pull off a false flag alien attack as rather low but I would keep the possibility in mind of there ever was an attack by "aliens".
In our obsession with antagonisms of the moment, we often forget how much unites all the members of humanity. Perhaps we need some outside, universal threat to make us recognize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world.
Bobbox1980 wrote:I don't believe in censoring speech. Let the man's speech be judged by each and every individual who comes across it rather than be judged by a few and then taken down so that others can't form their own opinions.
Bobbox1980 wrote:I mean c'mon, who in their right mind would…
Bobbox1980 wrote:Governments of the world could push whatever agendas they wanted under the guise of protecting ourselves from further alien attacks (one world government, martial law, whatever the hell they want to do).
Bobbox1980 wrote:I think you guys have such a hatred of all things exopolitics (some of it understandable) that it blinds your thinking even in mundane ways like speculating about alien attacks or false flag attacks to be blamed on aliens. You guys couldn't even bring yourselves to speculate and instead immediately attacked the author.
With freedom comes responsibility. Do you think yelling “Fire!” in a theater or “Bomb!” on an airplane when you know damn well there isn’t one is acting responsibly?
That’s just it, not everybody is in their right mind and f’ing with it is irresponsible at best and dangerous at worst.
Bobbox1980 wrote:I think with power comes responsibility, much moreso than with freedom, especially the responsibility to not violate the unalienable rights of others (ex: their body, their property, their choice).
Making it illegal to yell fire in a theater was a terrible precedent to set (not to mention the 1st Amendment "Congress shall make no law..." part). There were/are other remedies like civil suits. While I don't think it is responsible to yell fire in a theater when there isn't one some like Kissinger would say it is not responsible for a country of people (Chile) to elect communists (Allende) to office. Kissinger acted to overthrow a lawfully elected government based on his perceived right to make choices for others without their consent.
Many of us believe that when anti-Semitism dares to rear its head, it should be quickly and forcefully quashed. Anti-Semitism is racism and therefore inherently unjust. Racism turned against Jews reminds us of the Holocaust—that hate speech can be and was used to justify the murder of our people. This is not a theoretical conceit: It's a life and death—"never-again!"—issue.
In each of these recent cases, however, when Jews rose up to protest against anti-Semitic hate speech, they have been met with indignant campaigns accusing them of opposing free speech. As sensitive as any of us might be to anti-Semitism, who among us is not also sensitive to the un-American specter of opposing free speech?
Must we pay for free speech if it's hateful?
Thus those who define their right to present or publish whatever and wherever they want as a free speech issue, miss the point: Would they argue because a newspaper prints pornography that local merchants have an obligation to support it with advertising? Are advertisers obligated in the name of free speech to support a publication that prints racial offenses against African Americans? Of course not—just as merchants are not obligated as supporters of free speech to fund a publication or any expression that promotes anti-Semitism. That's just bad for business.
By the same token, we cannot permit those who oppose our withdrawal of support for anti-Semitic and even anti-Israel speech to adopt the free speech narrative. We must be clear in our communications: This is not about free speech. Free speech is something the government permits us as American citizens, and something the government cannot deny us. So here's our alternative narrative: Nothing in the Constitution says we have to listen to or read speech we don't like, and nothing says we have to pay for it.
"And I think all Nazis didn't see themselves as bad people. I've never met a racist yet who thought he was a racist. Or an anti-Semite who thought they were anti-Semitic."
-Norman Jewison
"We must recognize the fact that many Nazis, Marxists and Fascists believe passionately in their fundamental rightness, and allow nothing to hinder them from their goal in the pursuit of their mission."
-Dorothy Day
You (and anyone else) have no right to come in here and try to turn RU into a Forum that we feel would offend and turn off most of the readers who come along.
If you have an understanding of the history, and how such genocides can actually take place in a civilization we would like to believe does not have a natural tendency for the torture and mutilation of fellow humans - than you might grasp the need for bigots, racists, and f'ing a--holes like this to be shown the door when their disgusting little hitler-esque fantasies rear their ugly heads.
And if you agree with him about the inherent evil nature of jews - you can get the f*** out too...I am not preventing you from starting your own forum and publishing anti-Semitic crap out of your own pocket, but you're not going to do it on my dime.
That is the dumbest argument for yelling fire in a crowded public place that I have ever seen.
I will make it clear to Google that I would take my business elsewhere if they published speech that I find offensive and derogatory. That is my right.
If I walked into your house and you asked me to take off my shoes, I would out of respect for you and your house, even if I have every right to wear my shoes wherever I please. You are both in our house now, and we've asked you to take off your shoes.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests